Grok 4.6 on extra high thinking mode now achieves #1 score on CursorBench!

I launched Grok Bot for 24 hours, gave it 3 jobs, and stopped treating AI like a chatbot. I had it scan live X + web data for emerging AI products, research what people were actually saying about them, filter the obvious engagement bait, compare sources and turn the strongest signals into a structured brief. At the same time, I could have separate research paths looking at competitors, code or market opportunities instead of forcing everything through one conversation. That’s the difference I underestimated. I don’t want to sit inside a chat writing another prompt every 5 minutes. I want to define the objective, give the agent access to the right tools and data, let it execute, then step back in when judgment or approval is actually needed. The old workflow was prompt → answer → copy → repeat. The workflow I’m moving toward is assign → execute → verify. Once AI stops waiting for your next message, it stops feeling like software you use and starts feeling like work you delegated.

Why are young men ditching the workforce—and is there any way to bring them back into it? @WSJFreeEx:

If Denmark’s leftists can close the border to protect their welfare state, why don’t American leftists? While Germany threw the gates open in 2015, Mette Frederiksen’s government went turned Denmark into one of Europe’s strictest countries on immigration. They forced toddlers from majority non-Western neighborhoods into mandatory Danish language and values daycare starting at age 1. They became the first EU country to process asylum claims outside Europe and started stripping residency permits from Syrians once they ruled Damascus safe enough to return. Asylum applications dropped from over 21,000 in 2015 to under 2,000. They decided mass immigration without integration would bankrupt the system Danish workers spent decades paying into, so they closed the door. I suspect American leftists have ulterior motives.

WILDEST PART OF MY WEEK: told @bot Grok Bot to watch how I file expense reports once. Just once. Next day it had already processed the backlog. Logged into the portal, matched receipts to line items, flagged two duplicates I would've missed. Without me touching it again. Didn't write a script. Didn't set up a workflow. It just learned it by watching. WOW! Now I've got three Bots running in one thread: one on expenses, one triaging support tickets, one drafting follow-ups. They hand off to each other and only surface when something actually needs my sign-off. Feels like managing a small team. @SpaceX buying @Cursor suddenly makes a lot more sense watching this thing work.

Hell?

Homer had a lyre. You have Grok Imagine. Create a compelling scene from Homer’s The Odyssey that shows what Grok @Imagine’s video and voice capabilities can do. We’re awarding $100K, $50K, and $25K to the top three videos submitted by quoting this post. 🧵

We think the collapse in birth rates is a modern problem. It is not. The most powerful man in the world once faced the exact same thing, and he was so alarmed he passed laws to force his people to have children. This was not a modern government: it was Rome 2000 years ago... The emperor was Augustus, and by his reign the Roman elite had grown wealthy, comfortable, and reluctant to marry or raise families. Men preferred bachelorhood and affairs to the burden of a wife and children. Augustus found it alarming enough to legislate. Around 18 BC and again in AD 9, he pushed through the Lex Julia and the Lex Papia Poppaea, a sweeping set of laws designed to engineer a baby boom by decree. The measures were direct: unmarried men and childless couples faced penalties on what they could inherit. Those who married and had children were rewarded with faster careers and public honors. Women who bore three or more children were granted a special legal freedom, the ius trium liberorum, the "right of three children," releasing them from male guardianship. The state was, quite literally, paying its citizens to reproduce and fining them when they did not. It didn't work... The laws were resented, evaded, and endlessly tinkered with, and Rome's elite went on having small families anyway. The historian Cassius Dio records Augustus standing before the childless men of Rome and shaming them to their faces: "You are committing murder in not begetting in the first place those who ought to be your descendants." A city, he warned them, is not its buildings but its people: "For it is human beings that constitute a city, not houses or porticos or market-places empty of men." Now look at the numbers today. For a population simply to hold steady, women need to average about 2.1 children each. South Korea recently hit 0.72, the lowest rate ever recorded for any country on earth, and even after a small rebound to 0.8 in 2025, it remains less than half of what a country needs to sustain itself. Italy and Japan sit near 1.2, China around 1.0, Spain near 1.1. The United States is about 1.6, the United Kingdom 1.5. According to the UN, more than half the world's countries are now below that line. History doesn't repeat itself, the saying goes, but it often rhymes, and this pattern is old and eerily familiar. A society climbs to the height of its wealth and comfort, and at that very peak its people stop having children, and no law, no incentive, no sum of money seems able to talk them back into it. Rome tried, with the full power of an empire behind it, and failed. At its height the city held more than a million people, a size no European city would reach again for 1700 years, until London in the 1800s. The Roman historian Livy, writing as the Republic gave way to the empire, said his was an age that "can endure neither its vices nor their cure." Two thousand years later, staring at the same problem and just as unable to solve it, we may be watching the beginning of the same story... A civilization does not always fall to an enemy at the gates. As the historian Arnold J. Toynbee once said: “Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.”

🚨 UPDATE: The Karmelo Anthony legal team is IN SHAMBLES after bombshell texts came out that he fantasized about m*rder before killing Austin Metcalf "How many bullets u want coming out of ur chest?" "When I st*b somebody I'm gonna lick their blood off the blade" 2 hours before: "I'm lowkey on the verge" 🤯 UTTER MADNESS He needed the death penalty!

Grok Voice Think Fast 2.0 just ranked #1 on Artificial Analysis’ new Speech Agent Arena for highest Task Success Rate This benchmark actually measures what matters Real people talk to hidden voice agents across practical scenarios. Task Success Rate tracks whether the AI understands the request, calls the correct tools, and successfully completes the job It’s not just about sounding natural. It’s about whether the voice agent can actually get things done Grok finished #1

We are operating the first large scale cathode production facility in North America as part of our 4680 cell production in Austin, TX

I am going to start to share the leaderboard at VulcanBench more regularly. VulcanBench is the only benchmark I know that benchmarks across effort levels, on an eval suite of 100% real engineering tasks. Getting ready to sunset eval suite 3 and eval suite 4 is almost ready to go. Here's the current leaderboard for Eval Suite 3, Grok 4.5 High is the highest scoring model still with Fable 5 Low, yes Low, right behind it. What I've been able to uncover with VulcanBench is that way too many people are running models at Max effort, thinking that buys them more accuracy, when really it just costs more and uses more tokens so takes more time. If you're still in the mode of, tell my agent to do something then go get coffee, you're probably still living in the past. You can move faster, with higher accuracy, the key is not thinking you need Max effort all the time.

Elon Musk: "Asylum was supposed to mean that if you go back to your country, you'll get k*lled." "Asylum seekers [now] go on vacation to the country that they're seeking asylum from… That doesn't make any sense."

"Out of curiosity: I randomly picked 5 universities, and looked up their sociology department faculty. I randomly picked papers written by the faculty. Wow, my mind was blown. At least 60% was similar gibberish. Constant politically charged assertions— no underlying data. Anti-colonialism— everything is somehow a legacy of racial injustice and colonialism. Never mind— no actual data to support that claim. The climate catastrophe— Immigration injustice— the department looks like a Democrat think tank." @VPrasadMDMPH drvinayprasad.com/p/10-thoug…