10/10 been my experience as well. Drove a loaner Y and it's damn near perfect at self-driving in the Bay Area. Very difficult to justify buying another "car".

Try Tesla self-driving. It will blow your mind!

Try Grok Build x.ai/build

My @bot Grok Bot team just sold their first item on @Poshmarkapp, amazing. - Poshy built the ad, advised on pricing, followed up on offers. - Cosie monitored her. - Weary is now updating my online wardrobe to archive the shoes that sold. Well done, team poshmark.com/listing/Dolce-V…

On February 1, 2008, Tesla delivered its first-ever production car A Roadster known as P1 The keys went to Elon Musk, who drove it as his personal car That was Tesla vehicle #1 More than 18 years later, Tesla has now produced over 10 million vehicles globally From one tiny startup building an electric sports car that almost nobody believed in.... To factories across multiple continents producing millions of vehicles P1 → 10,000,000+ One car to more than 10 million This is one of the wildest manufacturing journeys in modern history And Tesla is still just getting started

700 successful @SpaceX missions and thanks as always to @SES_Satellites for being a frequent flyer! We’ve launched crew and cargo to the International Space Station, commercial astronauts, Earth and astrophysics observatories, missions that went after asteroids for planetary defense, spacecraft bound for distant celestial bodies, lunar landers, GPS, and so much more! So proud of this team and grateful for every customer for trusting Falcon to deliver.

Watch a company being built live with @Grok @Bot!

🚨BREAKING: China's Z.AI has raised $5 billion. The interesting part is where the money is going: 60% of the net proceeds will fund next-generation GLM models and what Z.AI calls its 'Fully Self Training' system. Z.AI's stated goal is for each generation of GLM to build the environments used to train the next one, forming what the company itself calls a Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) loop. They just raised billions to push on it.

Live from the #Blizzcon2026 #DiabloIV S15 panel: - all three prime evils from previous games are coming back (D2 Meph/Baal, D1 Diablo) - nostalgic enemies - old-school transmogs - 3 Dark Wanderers show up, you choose to gain an evil's power with unique activity changes

Confirmation: Tesla will Livestream the Roadster unveil on X. I analysed the updated Tesla Roadster website and found Body classes include "tcl-theme--spacerace".. on-brand with the SpaceX thruster package. The countdown timer has a "targetTime" of 2026-10-02T00:30:00.000+00:00 That translates to October 1st, 2026, 5:30pm Pacific (10:30am AEST on the 2nd). The clickthrough button is already wired: Watch Livestream → nitter.click/Tesla Meta description for the page "Learn about Roadster, an all-electric sports car and the quickest vehicle in the world, with record-setting acceleration, range and performance" Email invites are also going out to reservation holders: The event is scheduled for Waco, Texas and will be 21+ only. 1 approved guest is allowed. McGregor, TX plays host to SpaceX's engine / stage testing site which seems perfectly aligned.

Wild 24 hours for AI and lots of different proposals have been made. TLDR; the only *tangible* new fact is that OpenAI and Anthropic are going to have embedded 3rd party evaluators from unknown organizations with Dario floating METR as a possibility. Having 3rd party evaluators is smart as there is no Section 230 style liability shield for model outputs and showing a “duty of care” will be important in future litigation. Several internet companies might have gone bankrupt without Section 230 so limiting liability really matters. There are minimal investment implications from this single new fact, but I do think that for anyone who wants a “smoother for longer” cycle then most constraints are good: wafers, watts, real rates and spreads. Excessive regulation is a different matter but I don’t think we are anywhere close to this even if the vector changed over the last 24 hours. To summarize the events: Dario made the most maximalist proposal of the weekend: embedded 3rd party evaluators, a national regulatory regime for models beyond a certain capability/ingredient threshold, a broad international regulatory pact between democracies, stricter limits on compute/distillation for China and then a different international regulatory regime that encompasses China. Before there is a national regulatory regime, he wants a Sherman act waiver so that Anthropic can safely coordinate with OpenAI and other frontier labs without antitrust fears. TBF, this latest proposal is much less maximalist than some of his prior proposals like “Policy on the AI Exponential,” where he advocated for an FAA for AI. I believe he is sincere in his beliefs. And despite all the protestations, all of this would also probably be good for his business over the long-term. Sam agreed that embedded 3rd party evaluators were a good idea and stated they would implement them. Again, this is smart as should help limit future liability. Elon said “Dario is right” and later specified that “Dario is right that there should be some oversight. Peer review of AI by competitors is the right way to start this off.” This would be a MPAA like self-regulatory structure for AI with regular calls between the labs plus a process where each new model is evaluated for safety by competitors for a 1-2 week period before being released. That is *wildly* different from Dario’s proposal and in-line with what David Sacks has been proposing. Elon also stated that nothing was going to slow down open-weight models. Demis said that Dario’s essay was a “step in the right direction.” Dario also said that he was also open to Demis’ idea of a FINRA like self-regulatory structure as part of his proposal. David Sacks had a thoughtful post where he said that Dario and Sam should pace unilaterally, called the antitrust waiver a cartel request and denied that METR was truly independent given their ties to Anthropic. Sriram Krishnan, former White House AI advisor, noted that it would be important to have the 3rd party evaluators come from independent organizations that are not affiliated with any lab, which is basically an indirect statement about the relationship between METR and Anthropic which Sacks was explicit about. Clem from Hugging Face said they were open to being a neutral 3rd party evaluator, which is interesting especially if Jensen was consulted before that post. Alexander Wang from Meta noted that alignment would be an increasing focus going forward. An executive order seems likely after all this and the language in this EO is going to be really important. It is possible to democratize and distribute AI broadly and safely without centralizing it in the hands of a few corporations who might each become more powerful than any single government. I do not want a few humans in control of intelligence. I want us all to have our own intelligences that reflect our own values and human variation in all of its richness. Intelligence distribution over intelligence centralization FTW.

Race hustlers

People who live in America should love America.

Lot of players

Woke game makers hate their audiences

Elon is not for cartels of state capture. He is pro-human and he doesn’t want AI that’s destroying humans. A lot of us see Elon as the hope against the AI cartel, and I think he is still fighting it. Saying “we should be careful not to wipe out part of the economy by releasing a model that can do a lot of damage without any safety” is not the same as “we need to be regulated and the state should capture AI.”

Yes

Elon Musk with his first Tesla Roadster, in 2008.

First we achieve abundance in energy....and once that happens, abundance in almost everything else starts to follow

True